I just googled this thing on photoshopping

I just stumbled on this:
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressmaterials/pdfs/photoshop_guidelines_pr.pdf

Companies try so very hard top lodge their brands in our brains. They spend millions on getting them out into the memeosphere (yes thats a word, why not GOOGLE it).
When that brand is co-opted and becomes part of popular culture they then want to control it themselves. Sorry I should say THEY WANT TO CONTROL IT THEMSELVES???!!!
Hear Adobe and Google, it doesn’t work like that. And it smacks of tyranical power craziness to even try. Once the genie is out of the bottle you cant stuff it back in, but please keep trying its rather amusing.

But there is a greater issue here. You cant have your cake and eat it: Brands and trademarks are stuffed down our throats every hour of the day. You bombard us, lambast us, assail us and if we take control then consider it a victory and move on.
To paraphrase Banksy (http://www.thefoxisblack.com/2012/02/29/banksy-on-advertising/) its like owning the rocks you’ve been throwing at our heads.

windows home server is a steaming pile of poo

On paper the original WHS made sense as a backup solution. But note to self: in future research the restore process before investing time in the backup process.

WHS allows you to backup terabytes of data, but after trying to restore a 2.5tb backup and getting an ETA of 10+days, and a failed attempt to do a drive restoration (which involved buying to fresh 2tb drives and raiding them to create a drive large enough for the backup), I’m ready to boil my head.

Quick and dirty HDR shadow control

Its winter in the southern hemisphere. For my bread and butter, that means lots shots of houses with lots of contrast and heavy shadows. This one taken at 11am is typical. Now I usually bracket everything but sometimes – especially when shooting on my painters pole – the camera has moved too much for HDR to work – and sometimes it just doesn’t cut the mustard, or produces a result too different to the rest of the photos in the set. (See the very end for HDR output from my favourite HDR software – Oloneo).

This is how it looks in lightroom with no develop settings. Theres a lot of dynamic range to deal with and those shadows are blue – because the fill light is the sky.
1st stage in my workflow is to saturate everything and fill light those shadows in lightroom. Then apply a warm tone to the shadows.

So now you’ve got this:

Which is getting there, but those shadows are still distracting. Create a virtual copy and make the whole thing warmer. Get a good level of contrast in the shadows, the export both images to photoshop as layers…

Stack the lighter layer on the darker. Now you can use your blend-if sliders and layer mask to control where the new exposure should be seen:

(Double click on a layer in the layers pallette to access these). You can split the arrows by click alt/option and dragging.

This is telling that layer to make everything lighter than 196 completely transparent, and everything below 159 completely visible. (Where the numbers are the tonal value of the pixels ranging from 0 – black to 255 – white).

That gives us this

Which has warmed up the shadows. Its also not wanted in the rest of the image so create a layer mask and paint over:

To give this:

Now I want to apply extra lightening to the shadow area only. If I apply a curves adjustment layer and apply it only to this layer, it will alter the blend if parameters. A quick solution is to make a new layer, select it and layer 1, and then stamp to a new layer (ctrl+alt+E).

Which gives you this

This new layer combines the output of the blend-if sliders with the layer mask, but note: this is a quick and dirty process, its destructive – meaning that you cant go back and change the blend-if values later, you’ll have to recreate those steps and any others you’ve made after.

Now you can apply adjustment layers as clipping layers with gay abandon:

Finally a curves layer on top just to brighten the postbox area.

Now the concrete path looks flat, but you really want to draw the eye away from this anyway. Bokeh (or CS6’s focus blur) is your friend:

Total process time – about 5 minutes in photoshop, 5 minutes in lightroom.

And from Oloneo:

Which in this case has done well: There are no alignment problems in the 2 source pics, the tone of the green can be warmed and lightened using its hue controls:

However it still needs work in photoshop. You can ad an extra 5-10 minutes for processing – or about an hour per job.

The final shot: Its not art, but it pays the bills:

Canon is Rubbish

How one little thing can taint your perception of a company.

Canon is amazing. I’ve used their cameras for 20 odd years: I’ve loved most of them. As a company they’re huge, innovative, have pretty good attention to detail and seem to look after their customers reasonably well (which in the current unreasonable climate is reasonably complimentary).

Canon have – for years – not allowed you to download their camera utilities and bundled software unless you have the original disks that came with the camera.
The problem comes when you are out in the field, or have simply lost or misplaced or – in my case – thrown away the disks because
a) most of the software is useless
b) you simply think that – in 2012 – you can download utilities for software that has no use to anyone other than people that own a particular piece of hardware.

Lets just go over that last bit again. The software is useless – it has no function whatsoever – it is bereft of purpose – the sum total of its point is ZERO – if you do not own a canon camera. Canon could send the CD to every Nikon user on the planet without affecting their business one iota.

So every time I need something from their support site I write them a little reminder of how such a profoundly stupid policy can colour peoples perception of a company. Companies spend millions on attempting to inject their brand into the crowded meme space in our heads and imbue it with positive characteristics. With this policy they ensure that tagged onto that meme is a little postit note that says “these guys are rubbish”.

Heres my latest email, and I encourage everyone to do the same:

I am writing again to complain about your policy of not offering downloads of your supplied software. This policy is completely devoid of sense. It creates frustration and brand disloyalty. I do not understand how your management cannot see this – the level of myopia here continues to confound me, and that the policy is still in place in 2012 – when applications, let alone drivers, are now commonly free – is stupefying. The eos utility: what do you expect non-Canon users to do with the software exactly? This is not a rhetorical question. I’m actually curious. I’m curious what you are protecting yourself from, whilst happily annoying the crap out of time-poor professionals from around the world. And I’m wondering how Canon’s management structure can be so poor as to allow policies like this to continue year after year. Policies like these project an image loud and clear: you don’t give a crap about your users and your attention to detail is poor. Please revise this policy.

Get some rest. I you haven’t got your health, you haven’t got anything

Anyone else find that they cant sleep after working late? Takes an hour or to wind down? This lovely bit of software will play havoc with your colour balance, not recommended if you’re doing photographic or design work, but should mean you can answer a few emails before bed without becoming an insomniac.

http://stereopsis.com/flux/

winsxs folder (yawn)

If you dont know what this is or what it does don’t ask. Its not interesesting, but its important. Sort of like your spleen.

In windows 7 it can get pretty large – Mine was 11.2gb, significant on a 64gb ssd. This wonderous hack brought it down to around 6gb: http://www.iishacks.com/2011/06/23/reduce-windows-7-winsxs-folder-size/

reccommended🙂

windows essential software

I have about 8Tb on my system. Sometimes I know I’ve left a file somewhere. And sometimes I’ll let windows search for it.
Windows search is really truly a disaster area. It might work OK for people searching a few hundred megabytes in my documents. I doubt it. The most offensive part is the need to right click and open a file in its location. If you double click on a file you will lose the contents of the search and have to start over.

Fortunately (or unfortunately) I’ve been using windows since version 3. I’m used to its rubbish search. Which is why I pepper my filenames with keywords and synonyms, and this habitual redundancy has finally paid off courtesy of my new favourite windows utility. I need to get out more.

http://www.voidtools.com/

“Everything” searches every drive you tell it to search. After I downloaded it I expected it to take a few hours, maybe half a day, to index my drives. I set it up and seemingly seconds later it was complete. I incredulously typed something obscure into the search box and it immediately found it. I do mean immediately. Yes it found the one file I was looking for out of 22 million in no time at all. It runs in the background – or you can do what I do, just start it when needed and it will update its database on start.

The question it begs of course is WHY? Why is this not implemented within windows? Why is there not a quick search? Why is there not a metadata component of the file system? Why are we still saving things in millions of identical little yellow folders? Why Microsoft WHY?


Calendar

August 2016
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

twitter

  • @FitbitSupport your email form does not work with windows phone. (Does not accept country.) (facepalm) 8 months ago
  • @FitbitSupport tried all that, hence the "contact customer support". :/ 8 months ago
  • @FitbitSupport windows phone saying Bluetooth paired, charge hr not syncing, still showing wrong time. Have tried resetting 8 months ago
  • @filmthug saw birdman last night. Read your review today: Most definitely the most enjoyable part of the experience :) 1 year ago
  • @MitchBenn evolutionary science and Christianity is like oil and water. They wont mix, there's no need for them to mix, can exist unmixed.. 1 year ago

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.